On one dive trip a few years
ago, my Oceanic Prodigy computer
flooded. On another trip
my replacement’s battery failed.
Both incidents happened at the
end of my trips, but if they’d
occurred midway through, I’d
have been up a creek without
a backup.
That’s because when I’m
diving daily, my computer rarely
clears to a de-saturated level,
even overnight. So each dive
must be measured as part of a
series. Any break in the process
and I no longer have accurate
information to plan or monitor
subsequent dives.
Most mainstream live-aboards
and dive resorts rent computers,
so replacements are generally
available, but the rule of thumb
is to wait a day to dive with a new
computer. On a five-day dive
package, that wait
could cost me 20
percent of my
bottom time.
Loss of dive
time is just one
issue. Let’s not
forget that no
matter what else
it might do for you, a computer’s
primary purpose is to keep you
from getting bent. If you ever
find yourself descending deeper
than your dive plan, making
more dives than you intended to,
or even if you occasionally
surface with your computer still
in the “caution” zone, you’re
flirting with decompression sickness.
If you’re elderly, overweight,
out of shape or don’t dive much,
you’re even more susceptible to
DCS. For all these reasons, you
might want to consider the extra
margin of safety a backup
computer provides.
Who Uses a Backup?
We asked a few pros how they
felt about backups. As in any discussion
of dive gear, we got a
wide range of opinions.
Tech diving maverick Bret
Gilliam carries a spare computer
in his luggage, but doesn’t dive
with it, because, he says, “I
haven’t had a computer failure
since 1992.” In case of a malfunction,
he says he’d just sit out 12
hours and use his backup. If you
dive as often as Gilliam does, that
might not seem like much of a
sacrifice. But if you only make
one or two dive trips a year, do
you want to risk losing a full day
of diving . . . especially on a liveaboard
where there’s little else to
do but listen to the other divers
telling you what you’re missing?
Carl Huggins, a pioneer of
dive computer research who now
runs the Catalina Hyperbaric
Chamber, understandably takes a
far more cautious approach than
daredevil Gilliam. Huggins carries
two computers plus an
Aqualand watch. Yet, on repetitive
dives he still uses tables.
Your backup should be as conservative as your
primary ... however, since manufacturers
consider their algorithms trade secrets,
comparing computers gets to be quite tricky |
Many Undercurrent readers
have reported incidents when a
backup came in handy. Jesse
Meyer’s (Pinole, CA) Citizen dive
watch went into dive mode while
his plane was descending into
Cozumel, and didn’t revert to normal
operation until his return
flight. Nancy Balch’s (Louisville,
CO) two-year-old Oceanic
DataMax ProPlus also went haywire
in Cozumel when the low battery
warning started flashing — and
kept flashing even after they
replaced it!
But Jeffrey Reed’s (San
Francisco, CA) sad tale of woe tops
them both. In 1996, his one-yearold
hoseless, air integrated
Cochran computer died. The
screen, says Reed, “would just go
blank or refuse to leave surface
mode at 20 or 30 feet.” Cochran
replaced it with a Nemesis Pro that
locked up on the third dive and
wouldn’t unlock. After finally getting
the Nemesis Pro repaired,
Reed decided to use it as a backup
and bought a ScubaPro hoseless,
air integrated, nitrox-ready model.
Reed recalls,
“I took it to
Bonaire and
it also locked
up without a
way to unlock
it (no, I didn’t
violate its
parameters, it
just locked
up). I returned it to the shop
where I purchased it and they were
unable, even with a PC, to unlock
it. I traded for a hose-mounted,
air- integrated Suunto. It works fine
but I missed my wrist-mounted
readouts. So when I went to
Roatan last December, I used my
old Nemesis Pro without a problem.
Now I have an $800 Suunto as
a backup to an old Cochran that
has decided, late in its life, that it
wants to be a reliable piece of
equipment. Too weird!”
Unlike Reed, divers typically turn their older computers into
backups when they buy replacements
with more bells and
whistles.
Which Backup to Buy?
Yet choosing a backup computer
properly should involve
more thought than that. For one
thing, some computers are far
more conservative than others
when calculating decompression
needs. That’s a function of the
computer’s built-in algorithm, a
mathematical model that uses a
series of assumptions to approximate
the absorption of nitrogen
in various body tissues and the
rate at which it comes out of solution.
To play it safe, your backup
should be at least as conservative
as your primary. However, since
most manufacturers consider
their algorithms trade secrets,
and way too complex to share
with consumers, comparing them
gets to be quite tricky.
Mike Ward, who operates
Dive Lab in Panama City, FL, calls
it “a big black science.” Usually,
computers from a single
manufacturer tend to use the
same algorithm across the
product range. But algorithms
can be tweaked. Doug Krause, life
support product manager for
Oceanic, told Undercurrent that
Oceanic’s algorithms have been
modified over the years for new
models and newer generations of
older models. Krause concedes
that “Oceanic’s owner’s guide is
vague on algorithms.”
Jack Kuhn, proprietor of
Harbor Dive Center in Sausalito,
CA, recommends buying two
identical computers, one as your
primary and one for backup.
Brett Gilliam agrees, adding,
“That way you’ll be working with
similar displays, too.”
Buying two new computers at
once may be over your budget. Or,
you may want different things from
your primary (such as air integration)
than from your backup. Your
next best bet is to stay with the
same brand, and test the computers
against one another. Usually that
means diving with both and comparing
results, but Mike Ward
points out that some dive shops
have small recompression chambers
for testing depth gauges,
which can be used to compare 3-4
computers at once. He suggests
that you note their readings every
10 feet down and up and chart any
differences.
A couple of studies have grouped
computers with similar performance
characteristics. In the October
1999 Undercurrent (available online
at Undercurrent) we ran a
comparison chart from England’s Diver Magazine. You can also see a
more recent “Freedom/Risk”
chart on the Rodale’s website:
www.scubadiving.com/gear/2001gear/freedomrisk.shtml. But
these charts are not precise. For
instance, two computers in the
same general group may provide
different readings at different
depths.
If your backup allows you to
program certain parameters into
your algorithm (such as altitude),
you can probably adjust it to be
no less aggressive than your primary.
Meanwhile, there are other
features you might want to look
for (or avoid).
Size. On most dives, you won’t
look at your backup, except perhaps
to compare readings against
your primary. (At last! Something
constructive to do on a safety
stop!) So you’ll probably want
your backup safely tucked away
in your BC pocket. Reader
Clayton Fuller (Chula Vista, CA)
straps his to the handle of his
videocam housing, so he can
check his depth while he’s taping.
Others attach them to low
pressure hoses, or wear them on
their wrists. Wherever you keep
yours, be sure it doesn’t add to
snag problems underwater.
Smaller watch-style models like
Suunto’s Stinger and Mosquito
keep a low profile and remain
with you at all times.
Immersion switch. You don’t
want to be fumbling for two manual
activation buttons at the start
of each dive, so be sure your backup
is water-activated.
Readability. Displays should be
big and bright enough so you can
read them with a mask on, underwater,
and in dim light.
User-Changeable Batteries. Reader Leo Dioguardi (Apollo,
FL) changes batteries between his
primary and backup at different
times, so they’re less likely to go
out at once. However, changing a
battery mid-trip could wipe out
the computer’s memory, as reader
Mike Mullins (Woburn, MA)
found out with his Oceanic
DataMax ProPlus. So some divers
change batteries before each trip.
Sonic Alarms: You don’t want
this sort of intrusion from a backup.
Some models allow you to
turn sonic alarms off. Another nono
is the lockout feature, when
the computer stops providing
decompression information once
you’ve violated certain preset
parameters. As reader Richard
Jorgensen (Bradenton, FL) puts
it, “this lockout thing is like having
your car quit running after you
exceed the speed limit.” In fact,
one of the main uses readers cited
for using backups was being locked
out by their primary computers for
correctable violations such as
ascending too fast.
When traveling, you might want
to pack your backup in a separate
bag from your other dive gear —
maybe in your carry-on. However
airport security personnel may
delay your boarding as they check
it out or even insist that they check
it for you and deliver it after your
flight. That’s the only way, however,
to protect yourself if your primary
dive bag gets lost or delayed.
Table that Motion
If all this seems a bit too much,
NAUI may have a low-tech solution
for you. The venerable training
agency has released a new, simplified,
single table for no-decompression
recreational diving. NAUI calls
it a “No Calculation” table and
claims it will make repetitive dive
planning extremely easy and
straightforward. According to Tim
O’Leary, Director of NAUI
Technical Operations, the new
table “doesn’t rely on multiple
tables involving variable surface
intervals and residual nitrogen
times. One table does it all.” No
bells, no whistles, but it could get
you back in the water. . . even if
your computer crashes.
— Ben Davison