As Undercurrent has reported
previously, the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) banned
the practice of salt water fish feeding
by commercial operators back in 2001. The dispute began
over the issue of shark feeding and quickly polarized the dive
community. Local dive operators enlisted the support of organizations
such as PADI, DEMA (the Diving Equipment and Marketing
Association), and some diving publications to campaign against
the ban while various environmental and spearfishing groups
— with considerable less financial clout — supported it. Obviously,
local dive operators saw feeding as a major draw to divers and thus
had a strong economic incentive to maintain the status quo. The
dispute also attracted attention because it would set a precedent
for a practice that has become a major industry worldwide.
When their lobbying efforts failed, DEMA, along with several
dive operators and other interested parties, sued to overturn the
regulation, challenging its constitutionality on the grounds that it
was “without basis, factually, scientifically and logically,” and that it
discriminates against dive operators, divers and snorkelers.
Eventually, a Florida circuit court dismissed the suit, finding
that the FFWCC had provided a “rational basis for the rule.” A
key factor in the court’s decision was an affidavit filed by William
Alevizon, who has written frequently for Undercurrent on conservation
issues.
DEMA, et al., appealed the decision to Florida’s 1st District
Court, which upheld the lower court’s ruling in January.
According to Henry Cabbage, Media Relations Director of
the FFWCC, this decision makes any further appeals “highly difficult.”
Cabbage said that his organization “had reason to believe
that feeding excursions were affecting fish behavior,” because
of anecdotal evidence of fish flocking to the sound of boats’
motors.” He noted: “The industry has an excellent safety record
on these excursions, and we did not question that.” Since the
Florida rule went into effect, similar fish-feeding bans have been
enacted in Hawaii and the Cayman Islands.
Tom Ingram, DEMA’s executive director, told Undercurrent that his organization is considering its options in Florida and
studying the Hawaii and Cayman regulations. “We rarely put these
things to rest completely,” he noted.