Recreational divers typically rinse their equipment in “communal”
tanks filled with fresh water after completing dives.
Often all the equipment (wetsuits, booties, fins, BCDs, regulators
with mouthpieces and masks) is rinsed in common tanks.
In some facilities, a separate tank is provided for rinsing regulators.
Masks are often rinsed and even stored in a common tank
on boats before a dive.
Few studies have addressed the possibility that these communal
rinse tanks may harbor pathogens and transmit disease.
We first reported that communal rinse tanks at a dive facility
in Roatan indeed contained significant levels of many types
of microorganisms (Microbe, December 2007, p. 577). However,
because that dive facility did not allow us to sample the water
entering rinse tanks, we were unable to determine if the microorganisms
originated from the water used to fill tanks or from
equipment that was rinsed in the tanks.
Recently, a report documented the spread of conjunctivitis
among divers using two dive boats off of Fiji’s Vitu Levu Island
(Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, 2008 vol. 35, p. 169). Among
29 divers, 14 cases (almost 50 percent) of conjunctivitis were
ultimately documented. The pattern by which conjunctivitis
was spread among divers and between boats was consistent
with the outbreak arising from the divemaster, a Fijian resident,
who reported having an eye infection prior to the outbreak and
who placed his own mask in the communal mask container
(Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, 2008 vol. 35, p. 169). This
study established that disease can be transmitted among scuba
divers via communal tanks. (Read our interview with the
study’s author in our September 2008 issue.)
In October 2007, we investigated the extent to which bacteria
were introduced into communal rinse tanks, via water
used to fill tanks and via dive equipment rinsed in them, and
whether cleaning a rinse tank with bleach once a day reduced the subsequent bacterial population. A dive facility in Bonaire
cooperated in this study but wished not to be identified.
Samples from boats returning from
afternoon dives showed very high
levels of many types of bacteria. |
The facility had two rinse tanks for general equipment and
one tank for regulators. Each morning for three days, at 7:30
a.m., one equipment rinse tank, designated “A” was emptied,
scrubbed using undiluted bleach, then rinsed several times and
filled with fresh water from a hose. The other equipment rinse
tank, “B,” was emptied, rinsed several times with water and
filled with water from the same hose but was not bleached. We
did not empty, clean or fill the regulator rinse tank. During the
day, dive staff would occasionally drain and refill equipment
and regulator rinse tanks. Water samples were obtained from
the three tanks three times daily: 8 a.m., 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. The
samples were placed in a refrigerator until the day of departure,
then put in a suitcase, placed in a refrigerator 12 hours
later, and finally examined for colonies and photographed.
Pictures of plates can be viewed as a PowerPoint presentation
at http://www.hsc.wvu.edu/som/bmp/miller.asp - - click the
“Bonaire 2007” link under the topic “Research.”
No bacterial colonies were observed from water samples
filling the rinse tanks. The 8 a.m. water samples, immediately
after equipment tanks were cleaned with bleach (A) or not
cleaned with bleach (B) and filled with water, did not give rise
to any colonies on all three days.
In contrast, 8 a.m. water samples in the regulator rinse tank
contained a high level of bacteria on all days tested. Presumably the regulator rinse tank had been used to rinse regulators the
previous day and after night dives. At 1 p.m. and 5 p.m., rinse
tanks A, B and the regulator rinse tank usually showed high levels
of bacterial contamination. Cleaning tank A with bleach did
not reduce the subsequent bacterial level. In several instances,
water samples showed low levels of bacteria -- this was apparently
because the tanks had been recently drained and refilled.
It was only possible to obtain water samples from two mask
rinse tanks, both at 4 p.m., as boats were returning from afternoon
dives. Both of these samples showed very high levels of
contamination by many types of bacteria.
Our studies show that bacterial contamination of divers’
rinse tanks at this Bonaire facility was introduced by rinsing
equipment, not by water used to fill tanks. Presumably, other
potential pathogens, like viruses, are also introduced into the rinse tanks. If divers with a communicable illness (like
conjunctivitis, the “common cold,” infectious mononucleosis,
diphtheria and streptococcal infections) rinse equipment in a
tank, people who rinse after them may pick up the transmitting
microorganism and become infected.
We conclude that, if possible, scuba equipment, especially
mouthpieces and masks, should be rinsed well with fresh water
or alcohol swabs rather than in communal tanks, to reduce the
potential of spreading or contracting disease. Studies are now in
progress to identify the bacteria that inhabit the rinse tanks.
Michael R. Miller is a professor of biochemistry at West Virginia
University, and Tammy S. Miller is senior office administrator of
the department of microbiology and immunology at West Virginia
University.