Dear Ben,
Could you please tell me where the South Pacific
is? I'm referring to the April issue's travel article
about Chuuk, which mentions that these islands are
in the "South Pacific."I've been there twice, and each
time the islands were above the equator. I'd suggest
that this places them in the Central Pacific, or even
the "North" Pacific, if the South ends at the equator.
However, while I hear plenty of South Pacific I
almost never hear North Pacific. Seems like most
writers instinctively add "South" when they are writing
about almost anywhere in the Pacific Ocean. So,
as you're an editor, please tell me where the South
Pacific starts and ends? Or better, edit out "South" for
islands above the equator. Maybe get James Michener to write another book titled Tales of the North Pacific to
even out the misuse.
-- Harry Haley, Yorktown, VA
***
Dear Harry,
You're right. Mea culpa. I suppose we Americans
perceive any islands south of Hawaii with palm trees
as the South Pacific, and of course we are wrong.
But in our defense, and in Chuuk's defense, James
Michener's Tales of the South Pacific is a collection of
stories based on his experiences in the Pacific theater
during World War II, in which Chuuk played a big
role. So because Michener created the palm-treed
"South Pacific" identity that seems to encompass
Micronesia, we'll blame him for now, and think twice
before using that phrase for north-of-the-equator
locations in the future.
-- Ben