The algorithm, the mathematical calculation a
dive computer uses to make real-time data measurements
on time, depth and gas mix, cannot be
seen behind the glass counter in the store, but it's
the most important thing to understand about your
computer. Just as the launch of a spacecraft is a
spectacular thing to see, it's the navigation algorithm
that sees the crew safely to its destination and
back again to Earth. The same can be said of your
dive computer's algorithm -- it's designed to keep
you from getting hit with decompression sickness
(DCS).
As we age, our bodies change, so it could be the
dive computer you bought at age 55 may not have
the more conservative algorithm suitable for you
at age 70. So, how do you know if it's time to retire
that old computer? And how do you decide which
is the right one to purchase next?
The First Questions to Ask
To evaluate your current dive computer, ask
these questions: Can it be set for nitrox? Does it
allow you to set degrees of caution? Does it tell
you how long your air will last? Can you read and
understand the display easily?
If the answer to any of these questions is no,
dump that anachronism and get a modern, more
suitable computer. Your tired eyes will also enjoy
your new computer's clearer display; many computers
now have super-sharp dot matrix systems. If
you choose one with an organic light-emitting diode
(OLED) colored display, its main figures will change
from green to amber if caution is required, and then
to red if you've really outstayed your welcome. At
night, and in poor visibility, such an illuminated display
can be a godsend.
Aside from that feature, don't be misled by the
shiny perfunctory knobs and buttons offered by manufacturers as sales bait. You need to ask about
the algorithm and understand its ability to return
you safely to the surface. After all, what good is a
clearly visible display if you don't understand what
it's telling you? Buying a diving computer without
having a perfunctory understanding of what it does
is buying blind.
What good is a dive computer's clearly
visible display if you don't understand
what it's telling you?
|
So it's worth understanding a little bit about the
development of the algorithm and diving decompression
tables.
A Short, Important History of How Your
Computer Works
Way back in 1908, a Scottish physiologist
named John Scott Haldane was commissioned by
the British Royal Navy to prepare the first proper
decompression table. He based this on extensive
experimentation with DCS in goats, saturating them
with nitrogen to depths of 165 feet. Since then, other
physiologists have modified Haldane's discoveries
to try to theoretically improve things, but, by and
large, they're still using the same basic information.
In the 1960s, Albert Bühlmann, a professor at the
University of Zurich, came up with a decompression
algorithm for use in an early Uwatec computer, and
since it's now freely available in the public domain,
most computer manufacturers use a modified version
of that. (Look for the nomenclature "Bühlmann
ZH-16" with varying suffixes in computer specs.)
Here in the U.S., Drs. Ray Rogers and Michael
Powell designed the PADI recreational dive planner,
and their work was then turned into the DSAT
algorithm for no-deco-stop dives to a depth of less
than 100 feet. This proved unsuitable for European
divers, who habitually go deeper, so later Americanmade
computers came with dual-algorithms --
DSAT and Pelagic+, a derivation of the ZH-16. It is
important to know which of these algorithms your
computer is set to.
There was a time when divers made a single
dive or maybe two in a day, but the modern traveling
diver now may make up to six dives in a
day. With short surface intervals, an allowance
should be made for residual nitrogen levels from
previous dives.
The American physiologist Bruce Wienke came
up with an algorithm taking into account asymptomatic
microbubbles that may be present in a diver
but will most likely be added to, making them
larger and symptomatic, on a second dive. Many
modern computer manufacturers have bought
into Wienke's work, most notably, Suunto, Cressi,
Atomic and Mares. Some divers complain about the
punitive deco stops mandated on subsequent dives,
but that is the algorithm writer attempting to keep
you safe from harm. Older divers, with less efficient
hearts, lungs and circulatory systems, are more vulnerable
to an otherwise unwarranted attack of DCS
on repeat dives. Driven by the competition, other
manufacturers, particularly Scubapro, have added
adaptations to the ZH algorithm to account for
these microbubbles.
The problem with all of this is that no algorithm
writer can write one specifically tailored for you.
It's all based on hypothesis and Haldane's original
research from more than 100 years ago. Not
enough divers get bent to provide sufficient data, so
computer manufacturers tend to err on the side of
safety, while insisting at the same time that none of
their products can protect you from getting injured
by DCS.
Then Dick Rutowski, formerly the deputy diving
coordinator for the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, proposed that leisure
divers could be safer if they reduced the amount of
nitrogen they breathed by increasing the percentage of oxygen -- i.e., breathing nitrox. At first, Rutkowski
was pilloried for his suggestion, but now nitrox use
is commonplace among recreational divers. It still
amazes me that so many older divers cling to the
use of air, but remember that it's actually nitrox 21
because it contains 21 percent oxygen.
Setting Your Computer Straight
Modern computers can all be set for nitrox, and
if you are getting longer in the tooth, you should
certainly breathe that. However, setting the computer
to match the nitrox mix does not add safety, it
merely increases your no-deco-stop diving time. If
you want to add safety, either set a less oxygen-rich
mix or add a level of caution, which most modern
computers allow you to do.
You might set your computer to air (nitrox 21)
when using nitrox 32 -- always bearing in mind the
maximum operating depth of the mix you are actually
breathing. In this way, it calculates for a higher
level of nitrogen absorption. Many divers just use
the computer straight out of the box at its factory
settings. Wrong!
It's always worth reading the manual. For example,
if you buy a Scubapro computer for its microbubble
settings but leave it set at MB0, you are not
allowing for any micro bubbles whatsoever. Set
it at a micro-bubble setting (MB1 To MB3). Other
dive computers allow you to set Safety Factors (SF)
or Gradient Factors that, provided you follow your
computer's advice on the way up, decrease the
calculated rate at which you off-gas the nitrogen
that you've absorbed during the dive, making your
ascent slower.
Many computers can be operated in conjunction
with a transmitter that plugs into your regulator
first-stage. If you think this sounds too complicated,
let me offer you an appropriate analogy: There
was a time when we only had a gas gauge to go by
in our cars. Nowadays when you drive, which do
you refer to first on the dashboard, the gas gauge
or the "remaining miles left" indicator? It's the
same with gas-integrated computers. They tell you
not only the pressure of gas in your tank, but how
long it will last you at the depth you're at considering
the rate at which you've been breathing. Like
the miles-left indicator, you'll soon get used to
watching the remaining air time. Keep that longer
than the remaining no-stop time and you shouldn't
get into trouble.
Modern diving computers can be adjusted to
accommodate the fact that we are not as fit as we
were. They now give better information regarding
nitrogen absorption, especially considering that we
now typically make repetitive dives, and that info is
displayed in a much-improved way.
The mantra still applies: There are old divers
and bold divers, but few old, bold divers. Be one
of the latter by evaluating your current computer,
and if it doesn't meet the criteria I listed above,
then be smart enough to know what facets are
required in the new one you'll buy -- and understand
how it works.
-- John Bantin