An article in our November issue seems to have caused a
stir, as the majority of reader letters we received focused on
our travelin' diver's review of the Sunset House on Grand
Cayman and the comments made about shoddy accommodations,
bad food, and too many novice divers. The ratio seems
about 50-50 for those who agreed with the review and those
who didn't.
Dear Editor: While I value the majority of the
reviewers' opinions, it seems this person was very illinformed
of what Sunset House is about. My wife and I
have visited about five times since the '90s, and it seems
the same today as it was back then (although the lockers
need to be replaced). How can someone who has
over 3,000 dives, traveled around the world and lives in
Bonaire, not know what to expect?
As you know, Sunset House has been around forever
and is successful because people are there for the
diving and feel the divers should be responsible for
their equipment, etc. While I know that newbie divers
can be problematic, they've never really lessened my
enjoyment on a dive. On the other hand, perhaps this
review will discourage other pain-in-the ass travelers
from going to Sunset House.
-- Wayne Joseph (San Mateo, CA)
Dear Editor: Thanks for telling the truth about
Sunset House. Undercurrent is the only publication that
would dare do that, as [the resort is] well-funded and
can buy lots of advertisements.
I took my first dive group of about 35 divers there
in 1984, and it was great! It's also still very good if you
are going to Cathy Church's place to get photo lessons,
albeit the rooms and food are very expensive. But since
we first started going, it seems they have gone slowly
and steadily downhill over the years. We went back
several times and each time seemed not to live up to the
first. By today's standards, for experienced divers, they
do indeed way overprice and underdeliver.
-- John M. Davis (Chattanooga, TN)
Dear Editor: As a faithful subscriber for more
than 30 years, I read with interest the recent article
on Sunset House. I have found it to be exactly as they
advertise: a place for divers. The rooms are comfortable,
the boats depart on time, the staff is friendly and the diving interesting. As for being under the flight
path for the airport, that is correct, but the planes are
high enough, it is not a disturbance.
I have never experienced any of the failings
described in the accommodations. As for the diving, it
is what it is: good visibility, warm water with a reasonable
amount of underwater life, and close to mainland
U.S.A. It is not Micronesia or Fiji, nor does it pretend
to be. As for "newbie divers," everybody has to start
sometime. Be tolerant of others.
As one gets older, those are things that have more
importance than "hairy chested" diving. The reviewer
obviously did not do his homework, or he would not
have taken a 5mm wetsuit for 80-degree water.
My only complaint about Sunset House is the boats
are a bit long in the tooth and showing wear -- and one
has to carry one's weights back and forth to the boats.
-- William King (Isle of Palms, SC)
Dear Editor: We were particularly pleased with the
article on Sunset House and Grand Cayman. Your field
reporter did a spot-on assessment of the resort and the
island scene. We have been frequent visitors to Grand
Cayman since 1987 and had partial ownership of a
condo along Seven Mile Beach for 30 years. The island
has changed for the worse since the late '80s. It is no
longer a tropical paradise.
Sunset House is old and tired -- a remnant of old
Cayman. Though we have never stayed there, we
always visit the outdoor bar/restaurant and take
a shore dive or two there. It's refreshing to see an
honest report about a dive destination instead of the
rose-covered view that dive resorts and some dive
magazines offer.
-- Dennis and Louise Marquering (Corvallis, OR)
Our Reply: Read Undercurrent's Reader Reports to get a
spectrum of reviews of any dive resort and make your
own judgment as to what suits you best. www.undercurrent.org/UCnow/dive_reviews/all_destinations.html
Undercurrent's rule has been that we can correct
errors in reporting, but not impressions.