
Diving computers use an algorithm -- a mathematical
calculation, a process, or set of rules -- to be followed to
compute real-time decompression status during a dive.
This century, no physicists have taken it upon themselves
to write a new algorithm for dive computers. Manufacturers
have merely tweaked the algorithms. Most use an algorithm
based on the work of Swiss physicist
Albert Buhlmann (died 1994), some with
additional Reduced Bubble Gradient
Model (RGBM) modifications by Los
Alamos atomic physicist Bruce Wienke
(died 2020). Others use the Pelagic
DSAT algorithm, developed earlier
by Rogers and Powell, a Haldanebased
algorithm loosely based on data
similar to the PADI Recreational Dive
Planner, and more liberal (less cautious) than the Buhlmann
derivatives. It allows a diver to stay down longer and come up
faster, though it was intended for no-deco-stop dives to less
than 100 feet deep, not the kind of profiles many sport divers
use. Once a diver got into deco-stop diving, the stops tended
to be punitive.
During the late 1990s and early 2000s, as Technical
Editor of the UK's Diver Magazine, I regularly made side-byside
comparison tests of dive computers, photographing all
the displays at suitable intervals for later analysis, often on
deco dives beyond 165-feet. While most computers produced
similar results, it became apparent to me that the Pelagic
DSAT algorithm employed in Oceanic computers and
clones thereof was not suitable for the type of deeper diving
Europeans and more adventurous Americans did.
As you can imagine, this made me less than popular with
dive industry personnel, such as Bob Hollis, or the rest of
Oceanic's management, but eventually they caved in and
supplied Oceanic computers with a dual algorithm mode.
Today, users can switch between the
Pelagic DSAT algorithm and the
Buhlmann-type algorithm, Pelagic Z+.
In many dive stores, customers are
often not advised of this when they
purchase their computers, and certainly
not if they buy them online. And if
they don't read their manuals, as many
don't, they never discover this critical
feature. Were you told about the choice of algorithms when
you bought an Oceanic computer, or did you simply use it in
DSAT default mode straight out of the box?
When I dived in Truk lagoon, many fellow divers had
a second computer to back up their first, as they should.
And many complained that their (Pelagic DSAT) Oceanic
computers gave very different results than their Buhlmann
RGBM Suunto computers. I showed them how to switch
their dual algorithm Oceanic to the Pelagic Z+ (Buhlmann)
algorithm, and all came into line.
It was a case, shall we say, of no RTFM or, more delicately,
Not Reading the Manual.
-- John Bantin